Logiqa

LogiQA is the logical reasoning benchmark sourced from the Chinese National Civil Service Examination (NCSE) — providing multiple-choice reading comprehension questions that require formal deductive and inductive reasoning, making it one of the most challenging standardized logic benchmarks for language models and a key test of whether models can approximate a logical inference engine.

What Is LogiQA?

  • Scale: 8,678 multiple-choice questions (4 options) with 651 training and 651 test examples in the primary split (LogiQA 1.0); LogiQA 2.0 expands to ~35,000 examples.
  • Source: Translated from the Chinese Civil Service Examination — a rigorous standardized test used for government employment in China.
  • Format: Short passage + multi-choice question requiring logical inference over the passage.
  • Language: Originally Chinese, with an English translation; LogiQA 2.0 includes parallel bilingual versions.

The Five Logic Types Covered

Categorical Logic (Class Inclusion/Exclusion):
- "All engineers are employees. Some employees are managers. Can some engineers be managers?" — Syllogistic reasoning.

Conditional Logic (If-Then Chains):
- "If A then B. If B then C. A is true. Is C true?" — Modus ponens, chain rules.

Disjunctive Reasoning (Either-Or):
- "Either X or Y must be true. X is false. Therefore Y." — Disjunctive syllogism.

Causal Analysis:
- "Sales dropped after the policy change. Which conclusion best explains this?" — Abductive inference.

Argument Evaluation:
- "Which fact most weakens the argument that..." — Requires understanding argument structure and finding defeating evidence.

Why LogiQA Is Hard for LLMs

  • Non-Statistical Answers: The correct answer follows from logical necessity, not from what is statistically most plausible in pretraining text. A model cannot "guess" based on word frequencies.
  • Negation Sensitivity: "Not all A are B" is fundamentally different from "No A are B." Models systematically confuse these.
  • Multi-Premise Chaining: Many problems require holding 3-4 premises simultaneously and performing multi-step deductive closure.
  • Distractor Quality: Wrong answer options in NCSE are specifically designed to be plausible — they represent tempting but invalid logical conclusions, exactly what distinguishes human reasoning ability.

Performance Results

ModelLogiQA 1.0 Accuracy
Random baseline25.0%
Human (NCSE examinees)~86%
RoBERTa-large35.3%
DAGN (graph-augmented)39.9%
GPT-3.5~58%
GPT-4~72%
GPT-4 + CoT~80%

LogiQA 2.0 Improvements

LogiQA 2.0 (2023) addresses weaknesses of the original:
- NLI Format: Each question is reframed as a natural language inference problem (entailment/contradiction/neutral).
- Bilingual: Chinese and English versions with consistent difficulty.
- Balanced Categories: Equal distribution across the 5 logic types.
- Expanded Scale: ~35,000 examples enabling larger-scale fine-tuning studies.

ReClor Comparison

LogiQA is often paired with ReClor (from LSAT Logical Reasoning) for logic evaluation:

BenchmarkSourceScaleFocus
LogiQAChinese NCSE8.7kFormal deductive/inductive
ReClorLSAT6.1kAnalytical argument evaluation
AR-LSATLSAT2.0kConstraint satisfaction

All three require multi-step logical reasoning but differ in reasoning style — LogiQA emphasizes categorical and conditional logic, ReClor focuses on argument analysis.

Why LogiQA Matters

  • Cross-Cultural Logic Test: Demonstrating that rigorous logical reasoning is culturally universal — NCSE logic problems transfer cleanly to English.
  • Government AI Applications: Civil service AI (policy analysis, legal reasoning, regulatory compliance) requires exactly the logical reasoning that LogiQA tests.
  • Commonsense vs. Formal Logic: LogiQA highlights the gap between models' strong common-sense reasoning (commonsense QA benchmarks) and their weaker formal deductive reasoning.
  • Compositional Reasoning: Each logic type tests a building block of compositional reasoning — the ability to chain simple rules into complex valid conclusions.

LogiQA is civil service logic for AI — adapting the rigorous deductive and inductive reasoning standards that governments use to select public administrators, providing language models with a demanding test of whether they can actually follow chains of formal logical argumentation.

Take logiqa further

Ask the copilot about this term, or have our engineers assess it against your process.