Nvlink

NVLink is NVIDIA's high-bandwidth GPU-to-GPU interconnect — providing substantially higher bandwidth and lower latency than PCIe for multi-GPU systems, enabling efficient large-scale training and inference across multiple GPUs.

PCIe vs. NVLink Comparison

FeaturePCIe Gen4 x16NVLink 4.0 (H100)
Bandwidth (1 link)64 GB/s900 GB/s
Links per GPU118
Total bi-directional128 GB/s900 GB/s
Latency~1.5 μs~1 μs
TopologyStar (via CPU)Any (direct GPU-GPU)

NVLink Generations

  • NVLink 1.0 (P100, 2016): 160 GB/s.
  • NVLink 2.0 (V100, 2018): 300 GB/s total.
  • NVLink 3.0 (A100, 2020): 600 GB/s total.
  • NVLink 4.0 (H100, 2022): 900 GB/s total + NVSwitch fabric.

NVSwitch

  • Full all-to-all GPU interconnect fabric: Any GPU → any GPU at full bandwidth.
  • NVIDIA DGX A100/H100: 8 GPUs + 6 NVSwitches → 300 GB/s all-to-all.
  • NVLink Network (NVL72, 2024): 72 H100 GPUs in one NVLink domain.

Peer-to-Peer (P2P) Memory Access

// Enable P2P access between GPU 0 and GPU 1
cudaSetDevice(0);
cudaDeviceEnablePeerAccess(1, 0);

// Direct copy GPU0 → GPU1 (bypasses CPU)
cudaMemcpyPeerAsync(dst_on_gpu1, 1, src_on_gpu0, 0, size, stream);

Impact on Distributed Training

  • AllReduce within node: NVLink AllReduce ~10x faster than PCIe AllReduce.
  • Tensor parallelism: Sharded matrix multiply requires high-bandwidth all-reduce every layer.
  • Without NVLink: PCIe bottleneck limits GPU count for efficient tensor parallelism.
  • With NVLink: Can tensor-parallelize across 8 GPUs efficiently.

NVLink is the critical infrastructure for large-scale LLM training — without it, inter-GPU communication would bottleneck all forms of model parallelism, and trillion-parameter models would be infeasible to train within reasonable time and cost budgets.

Take nvlink further

Ask the copilot about this term, or have our engineers assess it against your process.